Tuesday, 2 March 2010

I Want Gets

CCHQ just sent out a good little release:

May 2007
David Cameron first backed a TV debate between the party leaders:

‘I hope in the next few days Gordon Brown will make clear that once he's actually the Labour leader and Prime Minister he'll take part in proper TV debates that could really help bring politics to life.’ (BBC News Online, 19 May 2007)

6 September 2007
David Cameron called for a televised debate:

‘Any time, anywhere. I will even pay for the taxi to take him to the studio. In fact, I'll even drive the cab!’ (David Cameron, The Sun, 6 September 2007)

27 February 2008
David Cameron used Prime Minister’s Questions to call once again for televised debates:
‘I want to put to the Prime Minister one other point that could help to restore some invigoration in our politics. It is this: there is no doubt that one of the reasons why the American elections have caught people’s imagination is that night after night the contenders debate in live television debates. Does the Prime Minister agree with me that the time for such live television debates at general election times has now come? Will he agree to hold television debates with the leaders of the main political parties so that people can see us discuss the issues, the policies and the challenges for the future of this country?’ (David Cameron, Hansard, 27 February 2008, column 1084)

26 April 2009
David Cameron repeated the call for televised debates in an interview with The Sunday Times:

‘Let’s have one. Let’s have several…Any time, any place, anywhere.’ (The Sunday Times, 26 April 2009)

19 July 2009
David Cameron reiterated his support for the debates:

“On the issue of a TV debate, I am in favour of it and the interesting thing is I’ve been in favour of it whether I'm ahead in the polls, behind in the polls, whether it’s just after being made leader of the Conservative Party or whether it’s right now. I think our democracy would benefit from elections where the party leaders debated against each other and I really hope that this time, because I'm in favour of it and want to have it and frankly, will sign up to any reasonable set of rules about how many debates and where and who with and all the rest of it, I really want this to happen, it would be good for our democracy, good for elections, good to help get people fired up and enthused in politics, and also we should test out these ideas through the modern media which for many people is television. So I hope that we can do it this time, but the Prime Minister seems to think that half an hour in the House of Commons every now and again is enough. It just isn’t.” (Adam Boulton Show, Sky News, 19 July 2009)

29 July 2009
David Cameron wrote to Gordon Brown asking him to clarify his position on holding a televised leaders’ debate:

‘Five months ago, when I challenged you at Prime Minister’s Questions to a televised studio debate, you refused. This morning, Lord Mandelson said you were open to the idea. But within an hour, a Downing Street spokesperson back-tracked, saying this was not the case.

‘The Government seems to have a number of positions on this. I’ve only ever had one: a prime time televised debate is just what our political system needs.’ (Conservative Party Press Release, 29 July 2009)

4 October 2009
ANDREW MARR: Well okay. Gordon Brown has said apparently that he is prepared to go head to head in television debates, but they'd like those debates to start now. In effect the great conversation, the great national argument is happening now and he'd like to get on with it. Will you pick up that challenge?

DAVID CAMERON: Yes, I'd be delighted. I mean I'm in favour … I asked Gordon Brown first I think back in, I think it was May 2007, over two years ago, challenged him to TV debates. I think they're a good idea. I think they will help enliven interest in our politics. So, yes, I'd be delighted to take part in television debates. Obviously we've got to get some of the rules straight and also we've got to have them during the election. And I do …

ANDREW MARR: But now now, not now?

DAVID CAMERON: Oh both, I'm happy. (Andrew Marr Show, BBC)

10 January 2010
ANDREW MARR: Let's come onto the next few months of election campaigning. How important are these debates going to be to you?

DAVID CAMERON: I think they'll be very important. I mean I'm delighted they're happening because I mean there is a danger right now that if all this election is about is the sort of production of competitive dossiers, we're going to bore the public to tears, and we've got to get across …

ANDREW MARR: Can the debates be interesting?

DAVID CAMERON: I hope so. And the main thing I'd say is the politicians have got to recognise this is not our campaign, this is not our election. This is the public's election, this is your election, and we have got to open it up. And we're going to try all sorts of ways, including using lots of innovative stuff on the Internet, of getting people involved and making sure it's their priorities. (Andrew Marr Show, BBC)
Brown is apparently "relishing the opportunity." Yeeesss...

1 comments:

John R
said...

I would rather stick pins in my eyes than watch any of these stage managed, "airbrushed", so-called debates.

We'll get four and a half hours of rehearsed answers to predictable questions....with the audience supposed to sit silently by and admire the charm and eloquence of the three performers.

Post a Comment