tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2787283052819380346.post8394747992382667078..comments2009-04-18T16:55:07.109+01:00Harry Colehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05099597763862011749noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2787283052819380346.post-63623378369782662582009-04-18T16:55:00.000+01:002009-04-18T16:55:00.000+01:00can you drop me an email please:<br /><br />editor@torybear.com<br /><br />Cheers<br /><br />TBEditorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05099597763862011749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2787283052819380346.post-29213427586254770902009-04-18T16:51:00.000+01:002009-04-18T16:51:00.000+01:00While the story was still up there on the Mirror site I checked the EXIF data on the photos (using Opanda EXIF as a Firefox plugin). The data showed the camera used and the shooting date and time, as well as details of the exposure. Whilst I don't recall the precise date and time details, I'm sure they were consistent with Draper having returned from his Canaries vacation. <br /><br />When you check the EXIF on his current story about Stavros Flatley you will find that those images were shot on April 15th 2009. <br /><br />Opanda also allows you to check the IPTC data. Coincidentally (?!), it shows that the IPTC record (which tags images as being shot by Vellacott for the Mirror) was edited on 10th December 2008 - presumably the date he took delivery of the camera. Perhaps the "sources" should re-examine the EXIF data, rather than the IPTC tag?<br /><br />You may also have noted that The Times carried a photo of Draper on his doorstep carrying the multi-coloured bag that holds his computer, and another white bag. Sounds like the Mirror may have tried to borrow that one to pull the wool over some peoples' eyes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com